Mer­ck ad­mits cy­ber­at­tack is hav­ing an im­pact on re­search, man­u­fac­tur­ing — we're just not sure how big

Mer­ck is still grap­pling with just how much dam­age they’ve in­curred as a col­lat­er­al vic­tim of the Not­Petya at­tack one month ago. And as a di­rect con­se­quence, they’re cut­ting their prof­it out­look and sig­nal­ing de­lays with some prod­uct sup­ply or­ders.

The phar­ma gi­ant dis­closed the news this morn­ing in their earn­ings re­port, with CFO Rob Davis telling an­a­lysts the com­pa­ny is still “as­sess­ing the full im­pact.”  But it has clear­ly had an im­pact on the num­bers. “The guid­ance would have been high­er with­out the cy­ber­at­tack,” Davis added.

Sup­plies of Keytru­da, Janu­via and Zepati­er will not be af­fect­ed, ac­cord­ing to the drug­mak­er.

Shares $MRK were flat in mid-morn­ing trad­ing.

The com­pa­ny isn’t pro­duc­ing any bulk prod­uct yet from any of its own fa­cil­i­ties, but sup­plies con­tin­ue flow­ing from con­tract man­u­fac­tur­ing re­la­tion­ships. In a state­ment to End­points News, Mer­ck ad­mits re­search has been af­fect­ed, but would not elab­o­rate on dos­ing in­ter­rup­tions or tri­al sched­ule changes.

The cy­ber-at­tack led to a dis­rup­tion of our world­wide op­er­a­tions, in­clud­ing re­search.  How­ev­er, we have been able to main­tain our clin­i­cal tri­al ex­e­cu­tion plan and we con­tin­ue to pur­sue pre­vi­ous­ly out­lined pri­or­i­ties.

On June 27, thou­sands of com­pa­nies around the world were hit by Not­Petya  — an ex­ploit based on stolen NSA tech­nol­o­gy. Mi­crosoft first en­coun­tered the virus with “worm ca­pa­bil­i­ties” in 12,500 com­put­ers in Ukraine, which then spread lat­er­al­ly to an­oth­er 64 coun­ties in­clud­ing the Unit­ed States, in­fect­ing com­put­ers that were not patched with crit­i­cal up­dates.

Mer­ck claims the patch­es were in­stalled. At the time they said, “gov­ern­ment au­thor­i­ties work­ing with us have con­firmed that the mal­ware re­spon­si­ble for the at­tack con­tained a unique com­bi­na­tion of char­ac­ter­is­tics that en­abled it to in­fect com­pa­ny sys­tems de­spite in­stal­la­tion of re­cent soft­ware patch­es.”

En­her­tu picks up an­oth­er win for As­traZeneca and Dai­ichi Sankyo, join­ing the pri­or­i­ty re­view lane for gas­tric can­cer

Five months after Enhertu received twin breakthrough therapy designations, AstraZeneca and Daiichi Sankyo are one step closer to nabbing another approval for their potential blockbuster drug.

The companies announced Wednesday morning that their billion-dollar antibody-drug conjugate has received priority review for HER2 positive metastatic gastric cancer. Already approved in the US for third-line metastatic breast cancer patients that are HER2 positive, Enhertu’s gastric cancer PDUFA date is scheduled for the first quarter of 2021.

Patrick Soon-Shiong at the JP Morgan Healthcare Conference, Jan. 13, 2020 (David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Af­ter falling be­hind the lead­ers, dissed by some ex­perts, biotech show­man Patrick Soon-Sh­iong fi­nal­ly gets his Covid-19 vac­cine ready for a tri­al. But can it live up to the hype?

In January, when dozens of scientists rushed to start making a vaccine for the then-novel coronavirus, they were joined by an unlikely compatriot: Patrick Soon-Shiong, the billionaire doctor most famous for making big, controversial promises on cancer research.

Soon-Shiong had spent the last 4 years on his “Cancer Moonshot,” but part of his project meant buying a small Seattle biotech that specialized in making common-cold vectors, called adenoviruses, to train the immune system. The billionaire had been using those vectors for oncology, but the company had also developed vaccine candidates for H1N1, Lassa fever and other viruses. When the outbreak began, he pivoted.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jude Samulski, Marianne De Backer

Bay­er buys a biotech ‘race horse’ with a $4B deal — $2B in cash — aimed at go­ing big in­to gene ther­a­py

In the latest sign that Big Pharma wants a leading place in the push to develop a new generation of cell and gene therapies, Bayer is stepping up today with a $2 billion cash deal to buy out one of the fast-moving pioneers in the field, while adding up to $2 billion more in milestones if the new pharma subsidiary can deliver the goods.

As part of a continuing series of deals engineered by Bayer BD chief Marianne De Backer, the pharma player has snapped up Asklepios, more commonly referred to in more casual fashion as AskBio. And they are paying top dollar for a Research Triangle Park-based company that raised $225 million a little more than a year ago to back the brainchild of Jude Samulski, the gene therapy pioneer out of the University of North Carolina Gene Therapy Center.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Sci­en­tists warn Amer­i­cans are ex­pect­ing too much from a coro­n­avirus vac­cine

The White House and many Americans have pinned their hopes for defeating the Covid-19 pandemic on a vaccine being developed at “warp speed.” But some scientific experts warn they’re all expecting too much, too soon.

“Everyone thinks COVID-19 will go away with a vaccine,” said William Haseltine, chair and president of Access Health International, a foundation that advocates for affordable care.

Christian Rommel (via Roche)

Bay­er fol­lows R&D deal spree by raid­ing Roche's can­cer group for its new re­search chief

The day after Bayer signed off on a $4 billion deal designed to put the company among the leaders in gene therapy development, the pharma giant has recruited a new chief for its R&D division. And they opted for an expert in the cancer field.

Christian Rommel, Roche’s head of discovery and early-stage oncology development, has been tapped to take over the job. Joerg Moeller, who got the top research post after early- and late-stage development roles were combined 2 years ago, is hitting the exit “to pursue other career opportunities.”

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Albert Bourla, AP

UP­DAT­ED: Where's the Pfiz­er ef­fi­ca­cy read­out? CEO Bourla says 'soon,' but you're go­ing to have to wait for it

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla had promised repeatedly that the pharma giant would know if its leading Covid-19 vaccine is effective by the end of this month — now just a few days away.

Instead, the company reported early Tuesday that it has yet to conduct any interim efficacy analyses. And it won’t now until sometime next month.

The news was included in a slide for their Q3 report.

In the morning Q3 call with analysts, Bourla says that they expect efficacy data “soon,” but noted that they wouldn’t be able to say anything until all the administrative work was done on the interim, which would take about a week. And he added that Pfizer isn’t going to say anything else about that hot topic until they have the data in hand.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Charles Baum, Mirati CEO

UP­DAT­ED: Mi­rati plots a march to the FDA for its KRAS G12C drug, breath­ing down Am­gen’s neck with bet­ter da­ta

Mirati Therapeutics $MRTX took another closely-watched step toward a now clearly defined goal to file for an approval for its KRAS G12C cancer drug adagrasib (MRTX849), scoring a higher response rate than the last readout from the class-leading rival at Amgen but still leaving open a raft of important questions about its future.

Following a snapshot of the first handful of responses, where the drug scored a tumor response in 3 of 5 patients with non-small cell lung cancer, the response rate has now slid to 45% among a pooled group of 51 early-stage and Phase II patients, 43% — 6 of 14 — when looking solely at the Phase I/Ib. Those 14 patients had a median treatment duration of 8.2 months, with half still on therapy and 5 of 6 responders still in response.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

No­var­tis CEO Vas Narasimhan signs off on a $231M deal to try some­thing new in the R&D fight against SARS-CoV-2

Patrick Amstutz was baptized by pandemic fire early on.

He and colleagues attended the notorious Cowen conference in early March that included some of the top Biogen execs who helped trigger a superspreader event in Boston. Heading back to his post as CEO of Molecular Partners in Switzerland, the outbreak was sweeping through Italy, triggering near panic in some quarters and creeping into the voices of people he knew, including one friend on the Italian side of the country.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 92,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Three years in­to a PhI­II pro­gram for a failed Duchenne MD drug, Cataba­sis hauls down the flag and ad­mits de­feat

Three years ago, Catabasis CEO Jill Milne and the crew insisted they had found good reason for great cheer once they plumbed the data from their failed study for the Duchenne MD drug edasalonexent. Plunging into the extended open-label data, they said, you could find solid evidence of efficacy. And that justified a try in Phase III.

But they were wrong.

Monday, after the bell, the little biotech acknowledged that their pivotal attempt following the mid-stage flop was another failure. The primary, change in baseline on the North Star Ambulatory Assessment, and the secondary on timed function tests both came up short of statistical significance.