Ralph Mechoulam. EPM via YouTube

Start­up EPM launch­es, high off cannabi­noid acid in­no­va­tion

When Sue Sis­ley opened the first bag of her Wash­ing­ton-li­censed weed, she knew some­thing was wrong. It came with the verisimil­i­tude of gov­ern­ment cheese, a bu­reau­crat­ic knock-off that nei­ther looked nor smelled like the re­al thing.

“It was this green pow­der with lit­tle sticks and leaves,” Sis­ley, head of the Scotts­dale Re­search Group, told End­points News ear­li­er this month.”So di­lut­ed.”

Sue Sis­ley

Two years ago, Sis­ley gained ap­proval for a PhII study on the ef­fects of mar­i­jua­na on vet­er­ans with PTSD. Since the 1960s, though, the DEA has on­ly al­lowed one lab in the coun­try, at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Mis­sis­sip­pi, to grow mar­i­jua­na. That meant that when Sis­ley and oth­er re­searchers be­gan some of the first mod­ern stud­ies on med­ical mar­i­jua­na, they were forced to use a prod­uct that looks more like oregano than weed. Al­so, it ap­peared to be moldy.

It was just one of sev­er­al prob­lems that have plagued cannabis re­search and kept the drug in­dus­try from fol­low­ing the stri­dent changes in the na­tion­al view of a once-taboo drug. More broad­ly, re­search in­to mar­i­jua­na and de­riv­a­tives such as cannabi­noids has suf­fered from a lack of pre­ci­sion: The un­der­ly­ing prob­lem be­hind the gov­ern­ment weed is that weed doesn’t come with a stan­dard dose of THC, or stan­dard­ized at all, as you’d want for a drug tri­al. And cannabi­noids might have more pre­ci­sion, but they’re plant ex­tracts — not the chem­i­cal com­pounds the FDA and drug com­pa­nies want for clin­i­cal tri­als.

Which is why Raphael Me­choulam, the 88-year-old Is­raeli “grand­fa­ther” of cannabis re­search, was so ex­cit­ed about the launch of the start­up EPM yes­ter­day and the sig­na­ture tech­nol­o­gy he helped pro­duce: The dis­til­la­tion, sta­bi­liza­tion and in­dus­tri­al-lev­el pro­duc­tion of cannabi­noid acids, the po­tent mol­e­cules that give rise to the plant’s psy­chotrop­ic ef­fects and that, com­pa­ny founders say, could move soon to the clin­ic.

“Here we have a new fam­i­ly of cannabi­noid that are prob­a­bly par­al­lel or even bet­ter than CBD it­self,” he told End­points.

Reshef Swisa

Me­choulam and CEO Reshef Swisa are care­ful to dis­tance them­selves from the plant and re­search done di­rect­ly on its con­sump­tion. But at its root, the point of the new mol­e­cules is to un­lock for the clin­ic the leaf and oil based ef­fects ad­vo­cates have boast­ed about for years and that orig­i­nal­ly drove Me­choulam to start study­ing mar­i­jua­na in the ear­ly 1960s, when as a young re­searcher at the Re­hovot-based Weiz­man In­sti­tute, he man­aged to con­vince a lo­cal po­lice of­fi­cer to il­le­gal­ly hand him five ki­los of Lebanese hashish and then prompt­ly car­ried the pun­gent par­cel from the sta­tion to his lab on a crowd­ed bus of pas­sen­gers ask­ing “What the hell is this smell?”

Me­choulam’s re­search then was to dis­till the ac­tive in­gre­di­ent in mar­i­jua­na, THC. This new sci­ence goes a cou­ple steps fur­ther, iso­lat­ing and sta­bi­liz­ing the acids that give rise to cannabi­noids in the first place.

The prob­lem with look­ing in­to these acids has al­ways been that while they ap­pear on the plant alive, they dis­ap­pear off the plant it­self as it be­gins to dry. This earned them the movie-style moniker “the mys­tery com­pounds,” Swisa told End­points. You could smoke weed your whole life with­out en­coun­ter­ing them.

But by tak­ing the acid from the plant and us­ing a par­tic­u­lar es­ter, EPM re­searchers were able to sta­bi­lize it, cre­at­ing a po­tent com­pound they can take in­to the lab as you would ibupro­fen. Swisa said they’ve spo­ken with the FDA, and their prod­uct would be treat­ed not as cannabis, with­out all its at­ten­dant rules and stig­mas, but as any oth­er drug in de­vel­op­ment.

“You can look at this com­pound as in­spired by cannabis,” Swisa said. “But it is a se­mi-syn­thet­ic com­pound.”

The im­pli­ca­tions are about as man­i­fold as the wild promise med­i­c­i­nal weed has some­times held, and on­ly tri­als will tell what in­di­ca­tions bear fruit. EPM has done re­search on hu­man cells and rats in­to the com­pounds’ ef­fect on IBD, skin dis­eases and meta­bol­ic dis­eases, find­ing sim­i­lar rates of ef­fec­tive­ness to steroids and oth­er drugs with­out the steep side ef­fects those drugs can bring. They hope to move in­to the clin­ic on a cou­ple in­di­ca­tions soon.

But the crux is that this puts the drug in a form — dis­crete, patentable and con­sis­tent — that makes them at­trac­tive to phar­ma, Swisa said. They hope to li­cense their prod­uct out to oth­er phar­ma­ceu­ti­cal com­pa­nies, and he not­ed that there was en­thu­si­as­tic in­ter­est when they pre­sent­ed the re­sults Mon­day in LA — but then again, they were pre­sent­ing at a cannabis con­fer­ence.

“Peo­ple chas­ing our re­searchers; peo­ple fol­low­ing them; peo­ple com­ing to ask what can be done; peo­ple com­ing to our booths, ask­ing ques­tions, see­ing what we can do and how we can col­lab­o­rate,” he said. “The in­ter­est is big.”

The field is in­deed hot right now de­spite on­go­ing con­cerns from some re­searchers, in­clud­ing Me­choulam, that the pub­lic is em­brac­ing CBD be­fore it’s been prop­er­ly test­ed. Re­sults from Sis­ley’s tri­al are forth­com­ing; oth­er tri­als are un­der­way or al­ready back with pos­i­tive re­sults and sci­en­tists are now mak­ing ef­forts to bio­engi­neer THC through CRISPR. This morn­ing, the EU OK’d a cannabis-based epilep­sy drug al­ready ap­proved by the FDA.

But for a re­searcher who’s been in the game as long as Me­choulam, there still aren’t enough clin­i­cal tri­als and there’s a bit­ter­sweet tinge to some of these new pro­nounce­ments. Me­choulam’s lab con­duct­ed a small clin­i­cal tri­al on CBD and epilep­sy in 1980, find­ing it all but elim­i­nat­ed seizures in 4 of 8 pa­tients and curbed them in three hours. But it was decades be­fore any­one took up that work.

“This was a pity,” Me­choulam said. “We could have saved thou­sands of pa­tients, in par­tic­u­lar chil­dren.”

The Price of Re­lief: Ex­plor­ing So­lu­tions to the Ris­ing Costs of On­col­o­gy Drugs

In 2020, The National Cancer Institute estimated about 1.8 million new cases of cancer diagnosed in the United States, while the costs associated with treatment therapies continued to escalate. Given the current legislative climate on drug pricing, it’s never been more important to look at the evolution of drug pricing globally and control concerns of sustainable and affordable treatments in oncology.

Lat­est news on Pfiz­er's $3B+ JAK1 win; Pacts over M&A at #JPM22; 2021 by the num­bers; Bio­gen's Aduhelm reck­on­ing; The sto­ry of sotro­vimab; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

For those of you who attended #JPM22 in any shape or form, we hope you had a fruitful time. Regardless of how you spent the past hectic week, may your weekend be just what you need it to be.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

A $3B+ peak sales win? Pfiz­er thinks so, as FDA of­fers a tardy green light to its JAK1 drug abroc­i­tinib

Back in the fall of 2020, newly crowned Pfizer chief Albert Bourla confidently put their JAK1 inhibitor abrocitinib at the top of the list of blockbuster drugs in the late-stage pipeline with a $3 billion-plus peak sales estimate.

Since then it’s been subjected to serious criticism for the safety warnings associated with the class, held back by a cautious FDA and questioned when researchers rolled out a top-line boast that their heavyweight contender had beaten the champ in the field of atopic dermatitis — Dupixent — in a head-to-head study.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Robert Califf, FDA commissioner nominee (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA/Sipa via AP Images)

Rob Califf ad­vances as Biden's FDA nom­i­nee, with a close com­mit­tee vote

Rob Califf’s second confirmation process as FDA commissioner is already much more difficult than his near unanimous confirmation under the Obama administration.

The Senate Health Committee on Thursday voted 13-8 in favor of advancing Califf’s nomination to a full Senate vote. Several Democrats voted against Califf, including Sen. Bernie Sanders and Sen. Maggie Hassan. Several other Democrats who aren’t on the committee, like West Virginia’s Joe Manchin and Ed Markey of Massachusetts, also said Thursday that they would not vote for Califf. Markey, Hassan and Manchin all previously expressed reservations about the prospect of Janet Woodcock as an FDA commissioner nominee too.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Michel Vounatsos, Biogen CEO (World Economic Forum/Ciaran McCrickard)

Bio­gen vows to fight CM­S' draft cov­er­age de­ci­sion for Aduhelm be­fore April fi­nal­iza­tion

Biogen executives made clear in an investor call Thursday they are not preparing to run a new CMS-approved clinical trial for their controversial Alzheimer’s drug anytime soon.

As requested in a draft national coverage decision from CMS earlier this week, Biogen and other anti-amyloid drugs will need to show “a meaningful improvement in health outcomes” for Alzheimer’s patients in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial to get paid for their drugs, rather than just the reduction in amyloid plaques that won Aduhelm its accelerated approval in June.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

CRO own­er pleads guilty to ob­struct­ing FDA in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to fal­si­fied clin­i­cal tri­al da­ta

The co-owner of a Florida-based clinical research site pleaded guilty to lying to an FDA investigator during a 2017 inspection, revealing that she falsely portrayed part of a GlaxoSmithKline pediatric asthma study as legitimate, when in fact she knew that certain data had been falsified, the Department of Justice said Wednesday.

Three other employees — Yvelice Villaman Bencosme, Lisett Raventos and Maytee Lledo — previously pleaded guilty and were sentenced in connection with falsifying data associated with the trial at the CRO Unlimited Medical Research.

Susan Galbraith, AstraZeneca EVP, Oncology R&D

Can­cer pow­er­house As­traZeneca rolls the dice on a $75M cash bet on a buzzy up­start in the on­col­o­gy field

After establishing itself in the front ranks of cancer drug developers and marketers, AstraZeneca is putting its scientific shoulder — and a significant amount of cash — behind the wheel of a brash new upstart in the biotech world.

The pharma giant trumpeted news this morning that it is handing over $75 million upfront to ally itself with Scorpion Therapeutics, one of those biotechs that was newly birthed by some top scientific, venture and executive talent and bequeathed with a fortune by way of a bankroll to advance an only hazily explained drug platform. And they are still very much in the discovery and preclinical phase.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 128,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

‘Skin­ny la­bels’ on gener­ics can save pa­tients mon­ey, re­search shows, but re­cent court de­ci­sions cloud fu­ture

New research shows how generic drug companies can successfully market a limited number of approved indications for a brand name drug, prior to coming to market for all of the indications. But several recent court decisions have created a layer of uncertainty around these so-called “skinny” labels.

While courts have generally allowed generic manufacturers to use their statutorily permitted skinny-label approvals, last summer, a federal circuit court found that Teva Pharmaceuticals was liable for inducing prescribers and patients to infringe GlaxoSmithKline’s patents through advertising and marketing practices that suggested Teva’s generic, with its skinny label, could be employed for the patented uses.

A patient in Alaska receiving an antibody infusion to prevent Covid hospitalizations in September. All but one of these treatments has been rendered useless by Omicron (Rick Bowmer/AP Images)

How a tiny Swiss lab and two old blood sam­ples cre­at­ed one of the on­ly ef­fec­tive drugs against Omi­cron (and why we have so lit­tle of it)

Exactly a decade before a novel coronavirus broke out in Wuhan, Davide Corti — a newly-minted immunologist with frameless glasses and a quick laugh — walked into a cramped lab on the top floor of an office building two hours outside Zurich. He had only enough money for two technicians and the ceiling was so low in parts that short stature was a job requirement, but Corti believed it’d be enough to test an idea he thought could change medicine.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.