Bioregnum, FDA, Insiders

The 2-trial hurdle for drug approvals is steadily losing ground. Are we devaluing the industry’s R&D gold standard?

Over the weekend I had a lengthy discussion with Acorda CEO and former BIO chairman Ron Cohen on Twitter about p values and FDA standards that I’d like to share with you.

It related to a story we ran a few days ago citing Stanford’s John P A Ioannidis on the likelihood of false positives when you set a standard for success at p<0.05. Ioannidis and several other statistical experts have voiced the need of raising that statistical bar — lowering the cutoff — to prevent stamping some failures as a success.

Cohen, who felt that the FDA’s “typical” standard requirement of two “adequate, well controlled” studies made it virtually impossible to get an approval based on a statistically shaky readout, wasn’t accepting any anecdotal analysis from me. He wanted hard numbers. So I got some. The FDA is quite explicit about the data used to approve a drug. It’s easy to check how many drugs were approved last year using the two-trial standard.

Endpoints Insider

Endpoints Enterprise

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.
Already a subscriber? Log in now
← Go back

We produce two daily email newsletters designed to give you a complete picture of what's important in biopharma. It's free to subscribe and never any spam. Join 42,200+ biopharma executives who read Endpoints News every day.

Access is subject to the terms in our Privacy Policy.

The best place to read Endpoints News? In your inbox.

Comprehensive daily news report for those who discover, develop, and market drugs. Join 42,200+ biopharma pros who read Endpoints News by email every day.

Free Subscription

Associate Principal, Life Sciences Partnerships
Flatiron Health New York City or San Francisco
Head of Business Development
Wren Therapeutics Boston, MA
Life Sciences Venture Professional
Northpond Ventures Washington, DC

Visit Endpoints Careers ->