Who are the women blaz­ing trails in bio­phar­ma R&D? Nom­i­nate them for End­points' 2022 spe­cial re­port

Over the past three years, End­points News has spot­light­ed 60 women who have blazed trails and su­per­charged R&D across the bio­phar­ma world. And judg­ing from the re­sponse we’ve re­ceived, to both our spe­cial re­ports and live events, telling their sto­ries — in­clud­ing any ob­sta­cles they may have had to over­come — has in­spired our read­ers in many dif­fer­ent ways.

But change takes time, and the fact re­mains that women are still un­der­rep­re­sent­ed at the up­per ranks of the drug-mak­ing world.

We are con­tin­u­ing with our an­nu­al tra­di­tion of putting to­geth­er a spe­cial re­port to rec­og­nize the grow­ing num­ber of en­ter­pris­ing women who are mak­ing waves in bio­phar­ma R&D.

They may all have dif­fer­ent views on is­sues and tack­le gen­der di­ver­si­ty dif­fer­ent­ly. They may al­so come from di­verse ge­o­graph­ic or eth­nic back­grounds. But they are in­creas­ing­ly speak­ing up: Af­ter Roe v. Wade was over­turned ear­li­er this year, women across the in­dus­try have led the fight for in­creased ac­cess to re­pro­duc­tive care.

Women and those in mi­nor­i­ty groups make up just 14% of board mem­bers at pub­lic mi­cro- and small-cap com­pa­nies, ac­cord­ing to a re­cent re­port by the Bed­ford Group and Transearch. And when it comes to board chairs, they rep­re­sent just 5.7% and 4.3%, re­spec­tive­ly.

Our lists are nev­er meant to be ex­haus­tive. Rather, we hope they will serve as a col­lec­tion of snap­shots in time, por­traits that will both hon­or and com­mem­o­rate the con­tri­bu­tions these women have made to the cre­ation of new med­i­cines.

So tell us about your CEOs, CMOs, CSOs, R&D di­rec­tors and the like who have left an im­pres­sion at your work­place, or at any oth­er firm with­in the in­dus­try. Their for­mal roles mat­ter less than the im­pact they’ve brought.

You may fill in the nom­i­na­tion form here or be­low. Al­ter­na­tive­ly, you can email your nom­i­na­tions to us at nicole@end­pointsnews.com and am­ber@end­pointsnews.com. Nom­i­na­tions close on Aug. 29, and our spe­cial re­port will run lat­er this year.

We look for­ward to meet­ing all of them.

Cre­ate your own user feed­back sur­vey

The Fac­tors Dri­ving a Rapid Evo­lu­tion of Gene & Cell Ther­a­py and CAR-T Clin­i­cal Re­search in APAC

APAC is the fastest growing region globally for cell & gene therapy trials representing more than a third of all cell & gene studies globally, with China leading in the region. 

APAC is the leading location globally for CAR-T trials with China attracting ~60% of all CAR-T trials globally between 2015-2022. The number of CAR-T trials initiated by Western companies has rapidly increased in recent years (current CAGR of about 60%), with multiple targets being explored including CD19, CD20, CD22, BCMA, CD30, CD123, CD33, CD38, and CD138.

The End­points 11; blue­bird's $3M gene ther­a­py; Bio­gen tout new neu­ro da­ta; Harsh re­views for can­cer drugs; and more

Welcome back to Endpoints Weekly, your review of the week’s top biopharma headlines. Want this in your inbox every Saturday morning? Current Endpoints readers can visit their reader profile to add Endpoints Weekly. New to Endpoints? Sign up here.

Reading about John Carroll’s pick of biotech’s most promising startups has become a treasured tradition. If you ever get curious about previous classes of the Endpoints 11, you can find all of them (plus a number of our other regular specials) here.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

EMA warns of short­ages of two Boehringer heart drugs due to a spike in de­mand

The EMA is putting EU member states on alert over the shortage of two drugs that counter heart attacks due to an uptick in demand.

On Friday, the EMA sent out a warning that two Boehringer Ingelheim drugs are experiencing a shortage: Actilyse and Metalyse. The drugs are used as emergency treatments for adults experiencing acute myocardial infarction, or a heart attack, by dissolving blood clots that have formed in the blood vessels.

The End­points 11: The top pri­vate biotechs in pur­suit of new drugs. Push­ing the en­ve­lope with pow­er­ful new tech­nolo­gies

Right around the beginning of the year, we got a close-up look at what happens after a boom ripples through biotech. The crash of life sciences stocks in Q1 was heard around the world.

In the months since, we’ve seen the natural Darwinian down cycle take effect. Reverse mergers made a comeback, with more burned out shells to go public at a time IPOs and road shows are out of favor. And no doubt some of the more recent arrivals on the investing side of the business are finding greener pastures.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar

Should SCO­TUS hear Am­gen's Repatha case? So­lic­i­tor gen­er­al says no

Back in April, Amgen said it was encouraged by the solicitor general’s anticipated review of its Supreme Court petition to rehear a Repatha patent case. They’re likely much less optimistic about the outcome now.

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar wrote in a recent 27-page brief that Amgen’s arguments “lack merit and further review is not warranted.”

The case traces back to a suit filed in 2014 against Sanofi and Regeneron’s Praluent, which ended up beating Amgen’s PCSK9 blockbuster Repatha to market by a month just a year later.

Phil Sharp, Nobel Prize laureate (L), and John Carroll, Endpoints News co-CEO (via Michael Last)

The End­points 11: Fire­side chat with No­bel Prize lau­re­ate Phil Sharp

On Thursday evening in Boston I had the great good fortune to talk about the creation of the biotech industry with Nobel Prize-winning scientist Phil Sharp. I learned quite a bit about the early days of Genentech, Biogen and Alnylam, which all helped birth this unusual drug development ecosystem. And that’s why we can do things like the Endpoints 11. Here’s my talk with Phil Sharp, which you can either watch or read below.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

Klick Health gath­ers biotech and phar­ma lu­mi­nar­ies to dis­cuss in­dus­try in­no­va­tions, in­vest­ments and fu­ture

At Klick Health’s first Ideas Exchange conference with biotech and pharma industry insiders since before the pandemic began, it was no surprise many conversations included Covid topics. Yet while vaccines and treatments were discussed, so too were the effects on drug development, federal responses, health inequities — and what to do now and next.

George Yancopoulos, chief scientist and cofounder of Regeneron, opened the conference responding to a question from Acorda CEO Ron Cohen about the spotlight on the industry during Covid and some of the “flak” biopharma has taken in the past.

FDA's out­side ex­perts vote in fa­vor of Fer­ring's fe­cal trans­plant for C. dif­fi­cile, set­ting the stage for Seres

FDA’s outside advisors voted in favor of Ferring Pharmaceuticals’ RBX2660, an experimental poop-based drug implant that the company says would be the first microbiota-based live biotherapeutic to receive an FDA green light.

That was a point repeatedly discussed during the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, or VRBPAC, meeting Thursday when evaluating Ferring’s fecal microbiota transplant, or FMT, for reducing the recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection in adults who have received antibiotics. Multiple members brought up the need for a regulated product amid a landscape of unregulated FMTs already happening in clinical care.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 150,800+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Jim Wells (UCSF)

An­ti­bod­ies once act­ed on­ly as pro­tein block­ers. Now, sci­en­tists are find­ing new ways to make them pro­tein de­stroy­ers

The first lab-made antibody medicine was approved in 1986 — it bound to an antigen known as CD3 on T cells and was meant to prevent kidney transplant rejection. While antibody technology improved, most antibodies were made as blocking agents, neutering clamps that attacked cells and proteins.

But then scientists got creative with their engineering. They made antibody-drug conjugates, or ADCs for short, which attached toxins or drugs to the antibodies, enabling them to kill cells. Then they made CAR-T therapies, which attached a patient’s T cell to the targeting fragment of an antibody, to destroy cancer cells.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.