Gly­coMimet­ics shares crash af­ter Pfiz­er team dis­miss­es their lead drug as a PhI­II fail­ure

Close to 8 years ago, the BD team at Pfiz­er signed a $340 mil­lion deal to li­cense in a mid-stage drug from Gly­coMimet­ics for a par­tic­u­lar­ly painful com­pli­ca­tion of sick­le cell dis­ease. There was no ex­act word on the cash in­volved, but the phar­ma gi­ant agreed to fund the en­tire Phase III ef­fort they would need for an ap­proval.

It didn’t work. 

Af­ter the mar­ket closed on Fri­day, the biotech re­port­ed that Pfiz­er ex­ecs had passed on word that the tri­al failed the pri­ma­ry end­point — time to dis­charge readi­ness — as well as key sec­on­daries. We didn’t get the hard num­bers, just the top-line news.

For Gly­coMimet­ics, which cit­ed this drug as their lead ther­a­py in the pipeline, it was a dis­as­ter. The biotech’s stock $GLYC lost 42% of its val­ue af­ter the bell.

Rachel King

The drug — called riv­ipansel (GMI-1070) — had been de­signed to cir­cum­vent a bi­o­log­ic process that spurs what’s called a va­so-oc­clu­sive cri­sis among sick­le cell pa­tients by bind­ing to all three mem­bers of the se­lectin fam­i­ly.

We found when Gly­coMimet­ics went pub­lic in 2013 that Pfiz­er agreed to pay just $22.5 mil­lion up­front for the deal, with $115 mil­lion — ev­i­dent­ly lat­er ad­just­ed to $80 mil­lion — due for de­vel­op­ment mile­stones. $20 mil­lion was re­served for first dos­ing in the late-stage study.

Biren Amin at Jef­feries al­so isn’t over­ly bull­ish on Gly­coMimet­ics next big Phase III cat­a­lyst in 2020.

The next read­out is from Up­ro PI­II AML tri­al in YE ’20, and we view the PI­II as risky.

“We are both sur­prised and deeply dis­ap­point­ed by this out­come, as we had strong­ly hoped that riv­ipansel would have a pos­i­tive ben­e­fit for peo­ple liv­ing with sick­le cell dis­ease,” said Gly­coMimet­ics CEO Rachel King in a state­ment.

BiTE® Plat­form and the Evo­lu­tion To­ward Off-The-Shelf Im­muno-On­col­o­gy Ap­proach­es

Despite rapid advances in the field of immuno-oncology that have transformed the cancer treatment landscape, many cancer patients are still left behind.1,2 Not every person has access to innovative therapies designed specifically to treat his or her disease. Many currently available immuno-oncology-based approaches and chemotherapies have brought long-term benefits to some patients — but many patients still need other therapeutic options.3

Covid-19 roundup: As­traZeneca shoots for 2B dos­es of Ox­ford vac­cine — with $750M from CEPI, Gavi

Forget 1 billion. AstraZeneca is now promising to supply 2 billion doses of Oxford University’s Covid-19 vaccine around the world per year.

Three new partners are coming on board to help reach that goal, as well as a broader vision to ensure access for nations that have been largely left out of the bargaining table.

CEPI — the coalition that’s been doling out grants to support other vaccine projects — is providing $383 million to support manufacturing of 300 million doses, while Gavi the Vaccine Alliance will chip in $367 million and be in charge of the procurement and distribution, a spokesperson told Wall Street Journal. A separate licensing agreement directs the Serum Institute of India to produce 1 billion doses for low- and middle-income countries, with the first 400 million due before the end of the year.

Is a pow­er­house Mer­ck team prepar­ing to leap past Roche — and leave Gilead and Bris­tol My­ers be­hind — in the race to TIG­IT dom­i­na­tion?

Roche caused quite a stir at ASCO with its first look at some positive — but not so impressive — data for their combination of Tecentriq with their anti-TIGIT drug tiragolumab. But some analysts believe that Merck is positioned to make a bid — soon — for the lead in the race to a second-wave combo immuno-oncology approach with its own ambitious early-stage program tied to a dominant Keytruda.

Endpoints Premium

Premium subscription required

Unlock this article along with other benefits by subscribing to one of our paid plans.

President Donald Trump (left) and Moncef Slaoui, head of Operation Warp Speed (Alex Brandon, AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: White House names fi­nal­ists for Op­er­a­tion Warp Speed — with 5 ex­pect­ed names and one no­table omis­sion

A month after word first broke of the Trump Administration’s plan to rapidly accelerate the development and production of a Covid-19 vaccine, the White House has selected the five vaccine candidates they consider most likely to succeed, The New York Times reported.

Most of the names in the plan, known as Operation Warp Speed, will come as little surprise to those who have watched the last four months of vaccine developments: Moderna, which was the first vaccine to reach humans and is now the furthest along of any US effort; J&J, which has not gone into trials but received around $500 million in funding from BARDA earlier this year; the joint AstraZeneca-Oxford venture which was granted $1.2 billion from BARDA two weeks ago; Pfizer, which has been working with the mRNA biotech BioNTech; and Merck, which just entered the race and expects to put their two vaccine candidates into humans later this year.

Michael Gladstone, partner at Atlas Venture

At­las rais­es new $400M fund amid spree of VC rais­es. Here’s what they’ll spend it on

You can add another few hundred million to the now Montana-sized reservoir of cash biotech VCs have raised since the WHO declared Covid-19 a pandemic.

Atlas Venture, the prominent Kendall Square incubator, has raised $400 million for its twelfth biotech fund, their first in 3 years. After a string of mammoth new raises from other major VCs in April and May, the total pot now stands between $5 billion and $6 billion, depending on how you slice it.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 83,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Leen Kawas, Athira CEO (Athira)

Can a small biotech suc­cess­ful­ly tack­le an Ever­est climb like Alzheimer’s? Athi­ra has $85M and some in­flu­en­tial back­ers ready to give it a shot

There haven’t been a lot of big venture rounds for biotech companies looking to run a Phase II study in Alzheimer’s.

The field has been a disaster over the past decade. Amyloid didn’t pan out as a target — going down in a litany of Phase III failures — and is now making its last stand at Biogen. Tau is a comer, but when you look around and all you see is destruction, the idea of backing a startup trying to find complex cocktails to swing the course of this devilishly complicated memory-wasting disease would daunt the pluckiest investors.

GSK presents case to ex­pand use of its lu­pus drug in pa­tients with kid­ney dis­ease, but the field is evolv­ing. How long will the mo­nop­oly last?

In 2011, GlaxoSmithKline’s Benlysta became the first biologic to win approval for lupus patients. Nine years on, the British drugmaker has unveiled detailed positive results from a study testing the drug in lupus patients with associated kidney disease — a post-marketing requirement from the initial FDA approval.

Lupus is a drug developer’s nightmare. In the last six decades, there has been just one FDA approval (Benlysta), with the field resembling a graveyard in recent years with a string of failures including UCB and Biogen’s late-stage flop, as well as defeats in Xencor and Sanofi’s programs. One of the main reasons the success has eluded researchers is because lupus, akin to cancer, is not just one disease — it really is a disease of many diseases, noted Al Roy, executive director of Lupus Clinical Investigators Network, an initiative of New York-based Lupus Research Alliance that claims it is the world’s leading private funder of lupus research, in an interview.

UP­DAT­ED: Es­ti­mat­ing a US price tag of $5K per course, remde­sivir is set to make bil­lions for Gilead, says key an­a­lyst

Data on remdesivir — the first drug shown to benefit Covid-19 patients in a randomized, controlled trial setting — may be murky, but its maker Gilead could reap billions from the sales of the failed Ebola therapy, according to an estimate by a prominent Wall Street analyst. However, the forecast, which is based on a $5,000-per-course US price tag, triggered the ire of one top drug price expert.

FDA de­lays de­ci­sion on No­var­tis’ po­ten­tial block­buster MS drug, wip­ing away pri­or­i­ty re­view

So much for a speedy review.

In February, Novartis announced that an application for their much-touted multiple sclerosis drug ofatumumab had been accepted and, with the drug company cashing in on one of their priority review vouchers, the agency was due for a decision by June.

But with June less than 48 hours old, Novartis announced the agency has extended their review, pushing back the timeline for approval or rejection to September. The Swiss pharma filed the application in December, meaning their new schedule will be nearly in line with the standard 10-month window period had they not used the priority voucher.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 83,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.