J&J R&D ex­ec Na­jat Khan — and da­ta sci­ence — are get­ting an el­e­vat­ed role at the phar­ma gi­ant

Na­jat Khan

J&J R&D chief Math­ai Mam­men an­nounced on LinkedIn that Na­jat Khan, who had been COO in the re­search arm, has been giv­en the ti­tle of chief da­ta sci­ence of­fi­cer — fit­ting in­to a trend over the last 2 years as the ma­jor play­ers in the in­dus­try look for new and bet­ter ways to man­age the mas­sive and grow­ing vol­ume of da­ta now at their dis­pos­al.

Khan, he en­thused, is bilin­gual in two key lan­guages: the sci­ence of drug de­vel­op­ment as well as da­ta sci­ences. And han­dled prop­er­ly, that can guide R&D to more wins with low­er costs — a long­time mantra in a world where ROI is gen­er­al­ly sore­ly lack­ing.

Na­jat has built and con­tin­ues to grow a world-class team that is ex­treme­ly dis­ci­plined in pick­ing the right high-val­ue prob­lems, de­ter­min­ing the right datasets (in­ter­nal and ex­ter­nal col­lab­o­ra­tions), iden­ti­fy­ing the right an­a­lyt­i­cal ap­proach­es to dri­ve so­lu­tions with a test-and-learn men­tal­i­ty, and then scal­ing to max­i­mize im­pact. These so­lu­tions re­sult in pro­grams that are faster or less cost­ly (ef­fi­cien­cy) or el­e­vate the prob­a­bil­i­ty of suc­cess and in­crease out­put (ef­fec­tive­ness).

Part of Khan’s ex­per­tise lies in the field of AI, where drug de­vel­op­ers have been turn­ing to gain some fresh in­sights in­to which drugs should go in­to the clin­ic. Low­er­ing the mon­u­men­tal fail­ure rate would go a long way to fix­ing what ails many of these big play­ers.

Khan got her PhD in or­gan­ic chem­istry at Penn and went on to be­come a phar­ma con­sul­tant at the Boston Con­sult­ing Group be­fore join­ing J&J, where she had worked on da­ta, strat­e­gy and op­er­a­tions.

Inside FDA HQ (File photo)

The FDA just ap­proved the third Duchenne MD drug. And reg­u­la­tors still don’t know if any of them work

Last year Sarepta hit center stage with the FDA’s controversial reversal of its CRL for the company’s second Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug — after the biotech was ambushed by agency insiders ready to reject a second pitch based on the same disease biomarker used for the first approval for eteplirsen, without actual data on the efficacy of the drug.

On Wednesday the FDA approved the third Duchenne MD drug, based on the same biomarker. And regulators were ready to act yet again despite the lack of efficacy data.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 87,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Cell and Gene Con­tract Man­u­fac­tur­ers Must Em­brace Dig­i­ti­za­tion

The Cell and Gene Industry is growing at a staggering 30% CAGR and is estimated to reach $14B by 20251. A number of cell, gene and stem cell therapy sponsors currently have novel drug substances and products and many rely on Contract Development Manufacturing Organizations (CDMO) to produce them with adherence to stringent regulatory cGMP conditions. Cell and gene manufacturing for both autologous (one to one) and allogenic (one to many) treatments face difficult issues such as: a complex supply chain, variability on patient and cellular level, cell expansion count and a tight scheduling of lot disposition process. This complexity affects quality, compliance and accountability in the entire vein-to-vein process for critically ill patients.

Stéphane Bancel speaks to President Donald Trump at the White House meeting on March 2 (AP Images)

UP­DAT­ED: Mod­er­na of­fers steep dis­count in US sup­ply deal — but still takes the crown with close to $2.5B in vac­cine con­tracts

The US pre-order for Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine is in.

Operation Warp Speed is reserving $1.525 billion for 100 million doses of Moderna’s Phase III mRNA candidate, rounding out to about $15 per dose — including $300 million in incentive payments for timely delivery. Given that Moderna has a two-dose regimen, it’s good for vaccinating 50 million people. The US government also has the option to purchase another 400 million doses for a total of $6.6 billion, or $16.5 per dose.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 87,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Cal­lid­i­tas bets up to $102M on a biotech buy­out, snag­ging a once-failed PBC drug

After spending years developing its oral formulation of the corticosteroid budesonide, Sweden’s Calliditas now has its sights set on the primary biliary cholangitis field.

The company will buy out France-based Genkyotex, and it’s willing to bet up to €87 million ($102 million) that Genkyotex’s failed Phase II drug, GKT831, will do better in late-stage trials.

Under the current agreement, Calliditas $CALT will initially pay €20.3 million in cash for 62.7% of Genkyotex (or €2.80 a piece for 7,236,515 shares) in early October, then circle back for the rest of Genkyotex’s shares under the same terms. If nothing changes, the whole buyout will cost Calliditas €32.3 million, plus up to  €55 million in contingent rights.

James Wilson, WuXi Global Forum at JPM20

FDA puts up a red light for Pas­sage Bio’s first gene ther­a­py pro­gram, de­lay­ing a pro­gram from James Wilson's group at Penn

Gene therapy pioneer James Wilson spearheaded animal studies demonstrating the potential of new treatments injected directly into the brain, looking to jumpstart a once-and-done fix for an extraordinarily rare disease called GM1 gangliosidosis in infants. His team at the University of Pennsylvania published their work on monkeys and handed it over to Passage Bio, a Wilson-inspired startup building a pipeline of gene therapies — with an IND for PBGM01 to lead the way.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 87,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Phase III read­outs spell dis­as­ter for Genen­tech’s lead IBD drug

Roche had big plans for etrolizumab. Eyeing a hyper-competitive IBD and Crohn’s market where they have not historically been a player, the company rolled out 8 different Phase III trials, testing the antibody for two different uses across a range of different patient groups.

On Monday, Roche released results for 4 of those studies, and they mark a decided setback for both the Swiss pharma and their biotech sub Genentech, potentially spelling an end to a drug they put over half-a-decade and millions of dollars behind.

Qi­a­gen in­vestors spurn Ther­mo Fish­er’s takeover of­fer, de­rail­ing a $12B+ deal

Thermo Fisher Scientific had announced an $11.5 billion takeover of Dutch diagnostics company Qiagen back in March, but the deal apparently did not sit well with Qiagen investors.

After getting hammered by critics who contended that Qiagen $QGEN was worth a lot more than what Thermo Fisher wanted to spend, investors turned thumbs down on the offer — derailing the buyout even after Thermo Fisher increased its offer to $12.6 billion in July. Qiagen’s share price has been boosted considerably by Covid-19 as demand for its testing kits surged.

Endpoints News

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 87,700+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it's free.

Xuefeng Yu in Hong Kong, 2019 (Imaginechina via AP Images)

CanSi­no reaps $748M wind­fall from Shang­hai IPO — as it warns Covid-19 vac­cine won't be a huge mon­ey mak­er

CanSino began the year with a clear goal to secure a secondary listing on Shanghai’s STAR market. Then something more urgent came along: As a rising vaccine developer on a mission to bring global standard immunizations to China, it heeded the call to make a vaccine to protect against a virus that would paralyze the whole world.

Xuefeng Yu and his team managed to keep doing both.

More than a month after CanSino’s Covid-19 vaccine candidate is authorized for military use in China, the Hong Kong-listed company has made a roaring debut in Shanghai. It fetched $748 million (RMB$5.2 billion) by floating 24.8 million shares, and soared 88% on its first trading day.

UP­DAT­ED: How much has pre­ci­sion med­i­cine helped? A new NCI study of­fers clues but pro­vokes skep­tics

Does precision medicine work?

The approach, based on finding a drug to target a patient’s specific genes, has undoubtedly saved individual lives, spurring Lazarus-like reversals in health in once-terminally ill patients. But critics have pointed out that its pursuit has meant drug companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars to target mutations that affect narrow slices of the populations, and that many of the gains researchers thought it would bring have eroded as cancers evolve resistance.