Stephané Bancel and Ingmar Hoerr (Image created by Endpoints News; Photo credit AP Images)

In Cure­Vac's fail­ure, a pos­si­ble ver­dict on the past (and fu­ture) of mR­NA vac­cines

When three com­pa­nies emerged in the win­ter of 2020 promis­ing that a fan­cy new tech­nol­o­gy called mR­NA could pull the world out of a dead­ly pan­dem­ic, it was easy to over­look the fact that not all mR­NA is cre­at­ed equal.

In fact, by the time Covid-19 broke out, the once in­su­lar world of mR­NA re­search had split in­to two ri­val camps. Cure­Vac, the world’s old­est mR­NA com­pa­ny, used the RNA from text­book bi­ol­o­gy. Four bases or “let­ters,” spelling out the in­struc­tions to make every pos­si­ble pro­tein. A, U, G, C. But Mod­er­na and BioN­Tech tin­kered with their RNA. If you zoomed in­to an atom­ic lev­el, it looked like some­one took out one of the let­ters, flipped half of it on its head and put it back next to the oth­er three, like a fa­mous paint­ing hung up­side down on a mu­se­um wall.

Endpoints News

Unlock this article instantly by becoming a free subscriber.

You’ll get access to free articles each month, plus you can customize what newsletters get delivered to your inbox each week, including breaking news.