Fol­low­ing a suc­cess­ful Phase III study in April show­cas­ing the safe­ty and po­ten­tial of its new sleep drug, Idor­sia post­ed some mixed news in the sec­ond Phase III study, but that won’t stop a planned fil­ing aimed at reg­u­la­to­ry ap­proval.

The drug, a dual orex­in re­cep­tor an­tag­o­nist (DO­RA) called dari­dorex­ant, was found to sig­nif­i­cant­ly im­prove sleep main­te­nance and sub­jec­tive to­tal sleep time in 25 mg dos­es, repli­cat­ing re­sults from the first Phase III study. How­ev­er, im­prove­ments in sleep on­set and day­time func­tion­ing nar­row­ly missed sta­tis­ti­cal sig­nif­i­cance, de­spite nu­mer­i­cal con­sis­ten­cy with the April study.

Idor­sia al­so test­ed 10 mg dos­es of dari­dorex­ant in the study and found pos­i­tive re­sponse across all four ef­fi­ca­cy mea­sures, but all fell short of be­ing sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant.

The new study mea­sured dari­dorex­ant’s ef­fects in 924 adult and el­der­ly pa­tients. Side ef­fects from the tests re­mained low, as with the first study, with se­ri­ous in­stances re­main­ing bal­anced across dosage amounts and place­bos, ac­cord­ing to the biotech.

Re­sults from the two stud­ies re­gard­ing the 25 mg dos­es and place­bos will now be pooled, and some an­a­lysts ex­pect this will of­fer a promis­ing pro­file to take to reg­u­la­tors. Ques­tions will like­ly re­main, how­ev­er, giv­en the cau­tion that reg­u­la­tors usu­al­ly take when ap­prov­ing in­som­nia treat­ments.

Pe­ter Welford at Jef­feries sees the poor re­sults for the low dose as a good thing, as it re­moves any temp­ta­tion the FDA may have to for­go the high dose and go with the less threat­en­ing low­er dose — as they did with Mer­ck. But its suc­cess is still no sure thing.

Im­por­tant­ly the low­er 10mg dose showed small­er non-sig­nif­i­cant ben­e­fits, re­mov­ing the risk reg­u­la­tors en­dorse a sub­op­ti­mal dose to err on the side of cau­tion, in our view. Com­mer­cial un­cer­tain­ties re­main.

In­som­nia drugs gen­er­al­ly are slow to be­come avail­able and are dif­fi­cult to pro­duce. The drugs are al­so heav­i­ly reg­u­lat­ed, as the FDA demon­strat­ed when it im­posed black box warn­ings last year on a slew of more com­mon­ly-known drugs like Lunes­ta, Am­bi­en and Sonata.

Where DO­RAs dif­fer from tra­di­tion­al in­som­nia drugs is in the in­hi­bi­tion of orex­in sig­nal­ing. Orex­ins, dis­cov­ered in 1998, are hor­mones pro­duced by the hy­po­thal­a­mus that reg­u­late sleep, arousal and ap­petite.

On­ly two DO­RAs have hit the mar­ket in the US, but they al­so faced up­hill climbs. Mer­ck’s Bel­som­ra (chem­i­cal­ly known as su­vorex­ant), re­leased in 2014, re­quired warn­ing la­bels re­gard­ing next-day resid­ual ef­fects and abuse po­ten­tial, among oth­er safe­ty risks.

Ad­di­tion­al­ly, Ei­sai’s DO­RA Dayvi­go (lem­borex­ant) scored an FDA ap­proval in De­cem­ber and launched last month but al­so need­ed sim­i­lar warn­ings.

Idor­sia spun off of Swiss phar­ma com­pa­ny Acte­lion af­ter a $30 bil­lion ac­qui­si­tion by John­son & John­son in ear­ly 2017. Idor­sia had been Acte­lion’s old re­search and de­vel­op­ment de­part­ment and is head­ed up by Acte­lion’s founder and CEO, Jean-Paul Clozel. Dari­dorex­ant is one of four de­vel­op­men­tal drugs cur­rent­ly in Idor­sia’s pipeline that has reached the Phase III stage.

For all the iterations and advances in TCR therapies for cancer, any experimental treatments involving T cell receptors share one trait: By definition, they only recognize antigens presented as peptides on the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) on cells.

Versant reckons it’s time to expand the arsenal. With $30 million in initial funding, its Ridgeline Discovery Engine in Switzerland has been working on a non-peptidic approach that it says has tumor-agnostic potential, especially in solid tumors. They’ve named it Matterhorn, after a Swiss mountain as they did with the three other companies that have emerged from the Basel-based incubator.

Nine months after launching a $500 million hunt for a cure for cystic fibrosis, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation said it will use a portion of those funds to do something it has never done before: help launch new companies.

The CF Foundation, whose venture philanthropy efforts helped fund Vertex’s line of powerful CF drugs, is teaming with Longwood Fund to create a CF incubator. The incubator will identify new companies with platforms or technologies that can be applied in the rare genetic condition. The partners can then finance early development in exchange for a commitment from the companies to focus on applications in cystic fibrosis.

It took one trip from San Francisco to Vancouver for Kiersten Stead and her DCVC Bio crew to feel confident about throwing their weight — and cash — behind AbCellera.

CEO Carl Hansen’s academic background and the potential of the platform, which combined machine vision and robotics with microfluidics, were promising. But the site visit sealed the Series A deal, where DCVC was the lead and only investor.

The race to develop CAR-T therapies has died down since Novartis’ Kymriah and Gilead’s Yescarta first crossed the finish line, though Tecartus also recently received approval. But the companies continue to expand their drugs’ applications, with Novartis preparing to conclude a new Phase II.

Interim data announced by the Swiss pharma show that Kymriah met its primary endpoint of complete response rate in treating patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, the second-most common form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Based on preliminary trial findings, Kymriah had received RMAT designation from the FDA in April for r/r follicular lymphoma.

It’s the end of the road for Voyager Therapeutics’ collaboration with AbbVie on tau and alpha-synuclein vectorized antibody development.

In two deals spanning the last two years, AbbVie dropped more than $134 million upfront for Voyager’s preclinical R&D of vectorized antibody treatments for diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. But Voyager says AbbVie is walking away now, without offering an explanation for why.